|
Recent Volumes |
|
Volume 1, 1998 |
|
Volume 2, 1999 |
|
Volume 3, 2000 |
|
Volume 4, 2002 |
|
Volume 5, 2002 |
|
Volume 6, 2003 |
|
Volume 7, 2004 |
|
Volume 8, 2006 |
|
Volume 9, 2006 |
|
Volume 10, 2007 |
|
Volume 11, 2007 |
|
Volume 12, 2007 |
|
Volume 13, 2008 |
|
Volume 14, 2008 |
|
Volume 15, 2008 |
|
Volume 16, 2009 |
|
Volume 17, 2011 |
|
Volume 18, 2012 |
|
|
|
The Bryant–Ferry–Mio–Weinberger
construction of generalized manifolds
Friedrich Hegenbarth and Dušan Repovš
|
|
Geometry & Topology Monographs 9
(2006) 17–32
|
Abstract
|
|
Following Bryant, Ferry, Mio and Weinberger we construct
generalized manifolds as limits of controlled sequences {pi:
Xi→ Xi-1 : i = 1,2,…}
of controlled Poincaré spaces. The basic ingredient is the
ε-δ–surgery sequence recently proved by Pedersen,
Quinn and Ranicki. Since one has to apply it not only in cases when the
target is a manifold, but a controlled Poincaré complex, we explain
this issue very roughly. Specifically,
it is applied in the inductive step to construct the desired controlled
homotopy equivalence pi+1: Xi+1→Xi.
Our main theorem requires a sufficiently controlled Poincaré
structure on Xi (over Xi-1). Our construction shows that this can
be achieved. In fact, the Poincaré structure of Xi depends upon a
homotopy equivalence used to glue two manifold pieces together (the rest
is surgery theory leaving unaltered the Poincaré structure). It follows
from the ε-δ–surgery sequence (more precisely from
the Wall realization part) that this homotopy equivalence is sufficiently
well controlled. In the final section we give additional explanation
why the limit space of the Xi's has no resolution.
|
Keywords
generalized manifold, Poincaré
duality, ε−δ–surgery, controlled, Quinn
index, Poincaré complex, ANR, cell-like resolution
|
Mathematical Subject Classification
Primary: 57PXX
Secondary: 55RXX
|
Publication
Received: 7 July 2005
Accepted: 7 July 2005
Published: 22 April 2006
|
|