Volume 17 (2013) 1–
Volume 17 (2013) Issue 1 1–620 Issue 2 621–
Volume 16 (2012) 1–4
Volume 16 (2012) Issue 1 1–624 Issue 2 625–1246 Issue 3 1247–1880 Issue 4 1881–2516
Volume 15 (2011) 1–4
Volume 15 (2011) Issue 4 1843–2457 Issue 3 1225–1842 Issue 2 609–1224 Issue 1 1–608
Volume 14 (2010) 1–5
Volume 14 (2010) Issue 5 2497–3000 Issue 4 1872–2496 Issue 3 1243–1871 Issue 2 627–1242 Issue 1 1–626
Volume 13 (2009) 1–5
Volume 13 (2009) Issue 5 2427–3054 Issue 4 1835–2426 Issue 3 1229–1834 Issue 2 623–1228 Issue 1 1–622
Volume 12 (2008) 1–5
Volume 12 (2008) Issue 5 2517–2855 Issue 4 1883–2516 Issue 3 1265–1882 Issue 2 639–1264 Issue 1 1–638
Volume 11 (2007)
Volume 10 (2006)
Volume 9 (2005)
Volume 8 (2004)
Volume 7 (2003)
Volume 6 (2002)
Volume 5 (2001)
Volume 4 (2000)
Volume 3 (1999)
Volume 2 (1998)
Volume 1 (1997)
Geometry & Topology 11 (2007) 1731–1732
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2007.11.1731
Correction to Geometry & Topology 5 (2001) 651–682
In [On iterated torus knots and transversal knots, Geom. Topol. 5 (2001) 651–682] the author's Theorems 1.1 and 1.2, combined, implied that iterated torus knots are transversally simple. This result is in error and this erratum pinpoints the error. In [An addendum on iterated torus knots, arXiv:math.GT/0610566] a more subtle result is proven resulting in giving a geometric realization of the Honda–Etnyre transverse (2,3)–cable of the (2,3)–torus knot example (appendix joint with with H Matsuda).
erratum, contact structures, braids, torus knots, cabling, exchange reducibility
Primary: 57M27, 57N16
Secondary: 37F20, 57R17
Received: 29 October 2006 Revised: 2 May 2007 Accepted: 2 May 2007 Published: 24 September 2007
© Copyright 2007 Mathematical Sciences Publishers. All rights reserved.