Volume 10 (2006)

Download this article
For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 18 (2014)
Issue 1 1–616
Issue 2 617–1244

Volume 17 (2013) 1–5

Volume 16 (2012) 1–4

Volume 15 (2011) 1–4

Volume 14 (2010) 1–5

Volume 13 (2009) 1–5

Volume 12 (2008) 1–5

Volume 11 (2007)

Volume 10 (2006)

Volume 9 (2005)

Volume 8 (2004)

Volume 7 (2003)

Volume 6 (2002)

Volume 5 (2001)

Volume 4 (2000)

Volume 3 (1999)

Volume 2 (1998)

Volume 1 (1997)

G&T Monographs
The Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Editorial Interests
Author Index
Editorial procedure
Submission Guidelines
Submission Page
Author copyright form
Subscriptions
Contacts
G&T Publications
GTP Author Index
ISSN (electronic): 1364-0380
ISSN (print): 1465-3060

A random tunnel number one 3–manifold does not fiber over the circle

Nathan M Dunfield and Dylan P Thurston

Geometry & Topology 10 (2006) 2431–2499

DOI: 10.2140/gt.2006.10.2431

arXiv: math.GT/0510129

Abstract

We address the question: how common is it for a 3–manifold to fiber over the circle? One motivation for considering this is to give insight into the fairly inscrutable Virtual Fibration Conjecture. For the special class of 3–manifolds with tunnel number one, we provide compelling theoretical and experimental evidence that fibering is a very rare property. Indeed, in various precise senses it happens with probability 0. Our main theorem is that this is true for a measured lamination model of random tunnel number one 3–manifolds.

The first ingredient is an algorithm of K Brown which can decide if a given tunnel number one 3–manifold fibers over the circle. Following the lead of Agol, Hass and W Thurston, we implement Brown’s algorithm very efficiently by working in the context of train tracks/interval exchanges. To analyze the resulting algorithm, we generalize work of Kerckhoff to understand the dynamics of splitting sequences of complete genus 2 interval exchanges. Combining all of this with a “magic splitting sequence” and work of Mirzakhani proves the main theorem.

The 3–manifold situation contrasts markedly with random 2–generator 1–relator groups; in particular, we show that such groups “fiber” with probability strictly between 0 and 1.

We dedicate this paper to the memory of Raoul Bott (1923–2005), a wise teacher and warm friend, always searching for the simplicity at the heart of mathematics.

Additional material
Keywords

random 3-manifolds, tunnel number, interval exchanges, one-relator groups

Mathematical Subject Classification

Primary: 57R22

Secondary: 20F05, 57N10

References
Forward citations
Publication

Received: 8 April 2006
Accepted: 13 November 2006
Published: 15 December 2006
Proposed: Cameron Gordon
Seconded: Rob Kirby, Joan Birman

Authors
Nathan M Dunfield
Mathematics 253-37
California Institute of Technology
Pasadena, CA 91125
USA
Dylan P Thurston
Mathematics
Barnard College
Columbia University MC 4436
New York, NY 10027
USA