Volume 9 (2005)

Download this article
For screen
For printing
Recent Issues
Volume 1, 1997
Volume 2, 1998
Volume 3, 1999
Volume 4, 2000
Volume 5, 2001
Volume 6, 2002
Volume 7, 2003
Volume 8, 2004
Volume 9, 2005
Volume 10, 2006
Volume 11, 2007
Volume 12(1) 2008
Volume 12(2) 2008
Volume 12(3) 2008
Volume 12(4) 2008
Volume 12(5) 2008
Volume 13(1) 2009
Volume 13(2) 2009
Volume 13(3) 2009
Volume 13(4) 2009
Volume 13(5) 2009
Volume 14(2010) preview
G&T Monographs
The Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Editorial Interests
Author Index
Editorial procedure
Submission Guidelines
Submission Page
Author copyright form
Subscriptions
Contacts
G&T Publications
GTP Author Index

Universal manifold pairings and positivity

Michael H Freedman, Alexei Kitaev, Chetan Nayak, Johannes K Slingerland, Kevin Walker and Zhenghan Wang

Geometry & Topology 9 (2005) 2303–2317

DOI: 10.2140/gt.2005.9.2303

Abstract

Gluing two manifolds M1 and M2 with a common boundary S yields a closed manifold M. Extending to formal linear combinations x=ΣaiMi yields a sesquilinear pairing p=⟨ , ⟩ with values in (formal linear combinations of) closed manifolds. Topological quantum field theory (TQFT) represents this universal pairing p onto a finite dimensional quotient pairing q with values in C which in physically motivated cases is positive definite. To see if such a "unitary" TQFT can potentially detect any nontrivial x, we ask if ⟨x,x⟩≠0 whenever x≠0. If this is the case, we call the pairing p positive. The question arises for each dimension d=0,1,2, …. We find p(d) positive for d=0,1, and 2 and not positive for d=4. We conjecture that p(3) is also positive. Similar questions may be phrased for (manifold, submanifold) pairs and manifolds with other additional structure. The results in dimension 4 imply that unitary TQFTs cannot distinguish homotopy equivalent simply connected 4–manifolds, nor can they distinguish smoothly s–cobordant 4–manifolds. This may illuminate the difficulties that have been met by several authors in their attempts to formulate unitary TQFTs for d=3+1. There is a further physical implication of this paper. Whereas 3–dimensional Chern–Simons theory appears to be well-encoded within 2–dimensional quantum physics, eg in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Donaldson–Seiberg–Witten theory cannot be captured by a 3–dimensional quantum system. The positivity of the physical Hilbert spaces means they cannot see null vectors of the universal pairing; such vectors must map to zero.

Keywords

manifold pairing, unitary, positivity, TQFT, s–cobordism

Mathematical Subject Classification

Primary: 53D45, 57R56

Secondary: 57N05, 57N10, 57N12, 57N13, 57R80

References
Publication

Received: 25 May 2005
Revised: 2 December 2005
Accepted: 3 December 2005
Published: 10 December 2005
Proposed: Robion Kirby
Seconded: Peter Teichner, Cameron Gordon

Authors
Michael H Freedman
Microsoft Research
1 Microsoft Way
Redmond
Washington 98052
USA
Alexei Kitaev
California Institute of Technology
Pasadena
California 91125
USA
Chetan Nayak
Microsoft Research
1 Microsoft Way
Redmond
Washington 98052
USA
Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of California
Los Angeles
California 90095-1547
USA
Johannes K Slingerland
Microsoft Research
1 Microsoft Way
Redmond
Washington 98052
USA
Kevin Walker
Microsoft Research
1 Microsoft Way
Redmond
Washington 98052
USA
Zhenghan Wang
Department of Mathematics
Indiana University
Bloomington
Indiana 47405
USA