Recent Issues |
| Volume 1, 2001 |
| Volume 2, 2002 |
| Volume 3, 2003 |
| Volume 4, 2004 |
| Volume 5, 2005 |
| Volume 6, 2006 |
| Volume 7, 2007 |
| Volume 8,
issue 1, 2008 |
| Volume 8,
issue 2, 2008 |
| Volume 8,
issue 3, 2008 |
| Volume 8,
issue 4, 2008 |
| Volume 9,
issue 1, 2009 |
| Volume 9,
issue 2, 2009 |
| Volume 9,
issue 3, 2009 |
| Volume 9,
issue 4, 2009 |
|
|
|
Classification of braids which give rise to interchange
Stefan Forcey and Felita Humes
|
|
Algebraic & Geometric Topology 7
(2007) 1233–1274
|
Abstract
|
|
It is well known that the existence of a braiding in a monoidal category
V allows many higher structures to be built upon that foundation. These
include a monoidal 2–category V–Cat of enriched categories and functors
over V, a monoidal bicategory V–Mod of enriched categories and modules, a
category of operads in V and a 2–fold monoidal category structure on V.
These all rely on the braiding to provide the existence of an interchange
morphism η necessary for either their structure or its properties. We ask, given a
braiding on V, what non-equal structures of a given kind from this list exist
which are based upon the braiding. For example, what non-equal monoidal
structures are available on V–Cat, or what non-equal operad structures are
available which base their associative structure on the braiding in V. The basic
question is the same as asking what non-equal 2–fold monoidal structures exist
on a given braided category. The main results are that the possible 2–fold
monoidal structures are classified by a particular set of four strand braids
which we completely characterize, and that these 2–fold monoidal categories
are divided into two equivalence classes by the relation of 2–fold monoidal
equivalence.
|
Keywords
iterated monoidal categories, enriched
categories, braided categories
|
Mathematical Subject Classification
Primary: 57M99
|
Publication
Received: 17 January 2007
Revised: 12 July 2007
Published: 24 September 2007
|
|